Changes
On March 14, 2024 at 1:02:15 AM +1100, National Native Title Tribunal:
-
Added resource Operational Map for Swamp Sclerophyll Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate to Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Added resource Native Forestry Map Viewer to Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Added resource Operational Map for Swamp Oak Floodplain Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate to Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Added resource Data Quality Statement to Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Added resource Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate to Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Added resource Operational Map for River-Flat Eucalypt Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate to Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Added resource Operational and Indicative Maps for the Assessment of Threatened Ecological Communities on NSW Crown Forest Estate to Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Added resource Operational Map for Subtropical Coastal Floodplain Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate to Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Deleted resource Operational and Indicative Maps for the Assessment of Threatened Ecological Communities on NSW Crown Forest Estate from Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Deleted resource Native Forestry Map Viewer from Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Deleted resource Operational Map for Subtropical Coastal Floodplain Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate from Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Deleted resource Data Quality Statement from Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Deleted resource Operational Map for River-Flat Eucalypt Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate from Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Deleted resource Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate from Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Deleted resource Operational Map for Swamp Oak Floodplain Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate from Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
-
Deleted resource Operational Map for Swamp Sclerophyll Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate from Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown Forest Estate
f | 1 | { | f | 1 | { |
2 | "author_email": null, | 2 | "author_email": null, | ||
3 | "creator_user_id": "8d2ac61a-d63a-4456-a00d-b35fee4c4025", | 3 | "creator_user_id": "8d2ac61a-d63a-4456-a00d-b35fee4c4025", | ||
4 | "extras": [ | 4 | "extras": [ | ||
5 | { | 5 | { | ||
6 | "key": "harvest_portal", | 6 | "key": "harvest_portal", | ||
7 | "value": "SEED" | 7 | "value": "SEED" | ||
8 | }, | 8 | }, | ||
9 | { | 9 | { | ||
10 | "key": "harvest_url", | 10 | "key": "harvest_url", | ||
11 | "value": | 11 | "value": | ||
12 | d.nsw.gov.au/dataset/assessment-of-floodplain-tecs-of-the-north-coast" | 12 | d.nsw.gov.au/dataset/assessment-of-floodplain-tecs-of-the-north-coast" | ||
13 | } | 13 | } | ||
14 | ], | 14 | ], | ||
15 | "groups": [], | 15 | "groups": [], | ||
16 | "id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | 16 | "id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | ||
17 | "isopen": true, | 17 | "isopen": true, | ||
18 | "license_id": "cc-by", | 18 | "license_id": "cc-by", | ||
19 | "license_title": "Creative Commons Attribution", | 19 | "license_title": "Creative Commons Attribution", | ||
20 | "license_url": "http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by", | 20 | "license_url": "http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by", | ||
21 | "likes": 0, | 21 | "likes": 0, | ||
22 | "maintainer": null, | 22 | "maintainer": null, | ||
23 | "maintainer_email": null, | 23 | "maintainer_email": null, | ||
24 | "metadata_created": "2018-06-15T08:52:36.797338", | 24 | "metadata_created": "2018-06-15T08:52:36.797338", | ||
n | 25 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T09:52:02.958051", | n | 25 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.458287", |
26 | "name": "assessment-of-floodplain-tecs-of-the-north-coast", | 26 | "name": "assessment-of-floodplain-tecs-of-the-north-coast", | ||
27 | "notes": "Operational map for River-flat Eucalypt Forest:\r\n\r\nThe | 27 | "notes": "Operational map for River-flat Eucalypt Forest:\r\n\r\nThe | ||
28 | operational map for River-flat Eucalypt Forest (RFEF) was constructed | 28 | operational map for River-flat Eucalypt Forest (RFEF) was constructed | ||
29 | to resolve long-standing issues surrounding its identification, | 29 | to resolve long-standing issues surrounding its identification, | ||
30 | location and extent within the NSW State Forest estate covered by the | 30 | location and extent within the NSW State Forest estate covered by the | ||
31 | coastal Integrated Forestry Operation Agreements. The map was | 31 | coastal Integrated Forestry Operation Agreements. The map was | ||
32 | constructed in two parts, with State Forests to the north of Sydney | 32 | constructed in two parts, with State Forests to the north of Sydney | ||
33 | being mapped in a separate process to those to the south of Sydney. We | 33 | being mapped in a separate process to those to the south of Sydney. We | ||
34 | did this to minimise the risk that relationships between regional | 34 | did this to minimise the risk that relationships between regional | ||
35 | vegetation communities and the TEC would be confounded or masked by | 35 | vegetation communities and the TEC would be confounded or masked by | ||
36 | geographical variation or other major ecological gradients, which | 36 | geographical variation or other major ecological gradients, which | ||
37 | might otherwise be a significant risk if we had treated the full | 37 | might otherwise be a significant risk if we had treated the full | ||
38 | latitudinal range of the TEC as a single study area. In total, we | 38 | latitudinal range of the TEC as a single study area. In total, we | ||
39 | assessed 1,218,000 hectares of State Forest across coastal NSW. This | 39 | assessed 1,218,000 hectares of State Forest across coastal NSW. This | ||
40 | consisted of 868,000 hectares of State Forest on the north coast and | 40 | consisted of 868,000 hectares of State Forest on the north coast and | ||
41 | more than 350,000 hectares of State Forest on the south coast. \r\nIn | 41 | more than 350,000 hectares of State Forest on the south coast. \r\nIn | ||
42 | both study areas, the project\u2019s Threatened Ecological Community | 42 | both study areas, the project\u2019s Threatened Ecological Community | ||
43 | (TEC) Reference Panel (the Panel) preceded the assessment process by | 43 | (TEC) Reference Panel (the Panel) preceded the assessment process by | ||
44 | reviewing the determination for RFEF and agreeing upon a set of | 44 | reviewing the determination for RFEF and agreeing upon a set of | ||
45 | diagnostic parameters for its identification. The Panel found that | 45 | diagnostic parameters for its identification. The Panel found that | ||
46 | RFEF is primarily defined by floristic plot data and that it is mostly | 46 | RFEF is primarily defined by floristic plot data and that it is mostly | ||
47 | located on coastal floodplains and associated alluvial landforms. | 47 | located on coastal floodplains and associated alluvial landforms. | ||
48 | \r\nFollowing on from these conclusions, we started the mapping | 48 | \r\nFollowing on from these conclusions, we started the mapping | ||
49 | process by mapping the distribution of floodplains and alluvial soils | 49 | process by mapping the distribution of floodplains and alluvial soils | ||
50 | and thus identifying possible areas of RFEF. For both the north and | 50 | and thus identifying possible areas of RFEF. For both the north and | ||
51 | the south coast we used an existing map of coastal landforms and | 51 | the south coast we used an existing map of coastal landforms and | ||
52 | geology in combination with several fine-scale models of alluvial | 52 | geology in combination with several fine-scale models of alluvial | ||
53 | landform features to determine the likely extent of floodplains and | 53 | landform features to determine the likely extent of floodplains and | ||
54 | alluvial soils within our study areas. \r\nWe used aerial photograph | 54 | alluvial soils within our study areas. \r\nWe used aerial photograph | ||
55 | interpretation (API) to assess the floristic and structural attributes | 55 | interpretation (API) to assess the floristic and structural attributes | ||
56 | of the vegetation cover found on our modelled alluvial environments, | 56 | of the vegetation cover found on our modelled alluvial environments, | ||
57 | and thus delineated polygons likely to contain RFEF. We also used API | 57 | and thus delineated polygons likely to contain RFEF. We also used API | ||
58 | to modify the boundaries of the modelled alluvial areas using a | 58 | to modify the boundaries of the modelled alluvial areas using a | ||
59 | prescribed list of eucalypt, casuarina and melaleuca species in | 59 | prescribed list of eucalypt, casuarina and melaleuca species in | ||
60 | combination with the interpretation of landform elements relevant to | 60 | combination with the interpretation of landform elements relevant to | ||
61 | alluvial and floodplain environments. \r\nWe then compiled floristic | 61 | alluvial and floodplain environments. \r\nWe then compiled floristic | ||
62 | plot data for all State Forest areas within our modelled alluvial | 62 | plot data for all State Forest areas within our modelled alluvial | ||
63 | landforms and API polygons. For both the north and the south coast the | 63 | landforms and API polygons. For both the north and the south coast the | ||
64 | floristic plot data was sourced from both existing flora surveys held | 64 | floristic plot data was sourced from both existing flora surveys held | ||
65 | in the OEH VIS database and from targeted flora surveys conducted | 65 | in the OEH VIS database and from targeted flora surveys conducted | ||
66 | specifically for this project. We compared these plots with those | 66 | specifically for this project. We compared these plots with those | ||
67 | previously assigned to flora communities listed in the determination | 67 | previously assigned to flora communities listed in the determination | ||
68 | of RFEF. Both dissimilarity-based methods and multivariate regression | 68 | of RFEF. Both dissimilarity-based methods and multivariate regression | ||
69 | methods were used for the comparison. The results of the comparison | 69 | methods were used for the comparison. The results of the comparison | ||
70 | were then used to assess the likelihood that the plots in State | 70 | were then used to assess the likelihood that the plots in State | ||
71 | forests belonged to one or more of the communities listed in the RFEF | 71 | forests belonged to one or more of the communities listed in the RFEF | ||
72 | determination. Following this, we developed a predictive statistical | 72 | determination. Following this, we developed a predictive statistical | ||
73 | model of the probability of occurrence of RFEF using plot data and a | 73 | model of the probability of occurrence of RFEF using plot data and a | ||
74 | selection of environmental and remote-sensing variables. For the north | 74 | selection of environmental and remote-sensing variables. For the north | ||
75 | coast, we used a Random Forest model, while for the south coast we | 75 | coast, we used a Random Forest model, while for the south coast we | ||
76 | used a Boosted Regression Tree model. \r\nTo create the operational | 76 | used a Boosted Regression Tree model. \r\nTo create the operational | ||
77 | map, we assigned every mapped API polygon to RFEF if appropriate based | 77 | map, we assigned every mapped API polygon to RFEF if appropriate based | ||
78 | on the plot data, over-storey and understorey attributes, landform | 78 | on the plot data, over-storey and understorey attributes, landform | ||
79 | features and modelled probabilities underlying each API polygon. | 79 | features and modelled probabilities underlying each API polygon. | ||
80 | \r\nWe mapped 3819 hectares of RFEF on the south coast and 198 | 80 | \r\nWe mapped 3819 hectares of RFEF on the south coast and 198 | ||
81 | hectares of RFEF on the north coast.\r\n\r\nOperational map for Swamp | 81 | hectares of RFEF on the north coast.\r\n\r\nOperational map for Swamp | ||
82 | Oak Floodplain Forest:\r\n\r\nThe operational map for Swamp Oak | 82 | Oak Floodplain Forest:\r\n\r\nThe operational map for Swamp Oak | ||
83 | Floodplain Forest (SOFF) was constructed to resolve long-standing | 83 | Floodplain Forest (SOFF) was constructed to resolve long-standing | ||
84 | issues surrounding its identification, location and extent within the | 84 | issues surrounding its identification, location and extent within the | ||
85 | NSW State Forest estate covered by the coastal Integrated Forestry | 85 | NSW State Forest estate covered by the coastal Integrated Forestry | ||
86 | Operation Agreements. The map was constructed in two parts, with State | 86 | Operation Agreements. The map was constructed in two parts, with State | ||
87 | Forests to the north of Sydney being mapped in a separate process to | 87 | Forests to the north of Sydney being mapped in a separate process to | ||
88 | those to the south of Sydney. We did this to minimise the risk that | 88 | those to the south of Sydney. We did this to minimise the risk that | ||
89 | relationships between regional vegetation communities and the TEC | 89 | relationships between regional vegetation communities and the TEC | ||
90 | would be confounded or masked by geographical variation or other major | 90 | would be confounded or masked by geographical variation or other major | ||
91 | ecological gradients, which might otherwise be a significant risk if | 91 | ecological gradients, which might otherwise be a significant risk if | ||
92 | we had treated the full latitudinal range of the TEC as a single study | 92 | we had treated the full latitudinal range of the TEC as a single study | ||
93 | area. In total, we assessed 1,218,000 hectares of State Forest across | 93 | area. In total, we assessed 1,218,000 hectares of State Forest across | ||
94 | coastal NSW. This consisted of 868,000 hectares of State Forest on the | 94 | coastal NSW. This consisted of 868,000 hectares of State Forest on the | ||
95 | north coast and more than 350,000 hectares of State Forest on the | 95 | north coast and more than 350,000 hectares of State Forest on the | ||
96 | south coast. \r\nIn both study areas, the project\u2019s Threatened | 96 | south coast. \r\nIn both study areas, the project\u2019s Threatened | ||
97 | Ecological Community (TEC) Reference Panel (the Panel) preceded the | 97 | Ecological Community (TEC) Reference Panel (the Panel) preceded the | ||
98 | assessment process by reviewing the determination for SOFF and | 98 | assessment process by reviewing the determination for SOFF and | ||
99 | agreeing upon a set of diagnostic parameters for its identification. | 99 | agreeing upon a set of diagnostic parameters for its identification. | ||
100 | The Panel found that SOFF is primarily defined by floristic plot data | 100 | The Panel found that SOFF is primarily defined by floristic plot data | ||
101 | and that it is mostly located on coastal floodplains and associated | 101 | and that it is mostly located on coastal floodplains and associated | ||
102 | alluvial landforms.\r\nFollowing on from these conclusions, we started | 102 | alluvial landforms.\r\nFollowing on from these conclusions, we started | ||
103 | the mapping process by mapping the distribution of floodplains and | 103 | the mapping process by mapping the distribution of floodplains and | ||
104 | alluvial soils and thus identifying possible areas of SOFF. For both | 104 | alluvial soils and thus identifying possible areas of SOFF. For both | ||
105 | the north and the south coast we used an existing map of coastal | 105 | the north and the south coast we used an existing map of coastal | ||
106 | landforms and geology in combination with several fine-scale models of | 106 | landforms and geology in combination with several fine-scale models of | ||
107 | alluvial landform features to determine the likely extent of | 107 | alluvial landform features to determine the likely extent of | ||
108 | floodplains and alluvial soils within our study areas.\r\nWe used | 108 | floodplains and alluvial soils within our study areas.\r\nWe used | ||
109 | aerial photograph interpretation (API) to assess floristic and | 109 | aerial photograph interpretation (API) to assess floristic and | ||
110 | structural attributes of the vegetation cover on our modelled alluvial | 110 | structural attributes of the vegetation cover on our modelled alluvial | ||
111 | environments, and thus delineated polygons likely to contain SOFF. We | 111 | environments, and thus delineated polygons likely to contain SOFF. We | ||
112 | also used API to modify the boundaries of the modelled alluvial areas | 112 | also used API to modify the boundaries of the modelled alluvial areas | ||
113 | using a prescribed list of casuarina and melaleuca species in | 113 | using a prescribed list of casuarina and melaleuca species in | ||
114 | combination with the interpretation of landform elements relevant to | 114 | combination with the interpretation of landform elements relevant to | ||
115 | alluvial and floodplain environments.\r\nWe then compiled floristic | 115 | alluvial and floodplain environments.\r\nWe then compiled floristic | ||
116 | plot data for all State Forest areas within our modelled alluvial | 116 | plot data for all State Forest areas within our modelled alluvial | ||
117 | landforms and API polygons. For both the north and the south coast the | 117 | landforms and API polygons. For both the north and the south coast the | ||
118 | floristic plot data was sourced from both existing flora surveys held | 118 | floristic plot data was sourced from both existing flora surveys held | ||
119 | in the OEH VIS database and from targeted flora surveys conducted | 119 | in the OEH VIS database and from targeted flora surveys conducted | ||
120 | specifically for this project. We compared these plots with those | 120 | specifically for this project. We compared these plots with those | ||
121 | previously assigned to flora communities listed in the determination | 121 | previously assigned to flora communities listed in the determination | ||
122 | of SOFF. Both dissimilarity-based methods and multivariate regression | 122 | of SOFF. Both dissimilarity-based methods and multivariate regression | ||
123 | methods were used for the comparison. The results of the comparison | 123 | methods were used for the comparison. The results of the comparison | ||
124 | were then used to assess the likelihood that the plots in State | 124 | were then used to assess the likelihood that the plots in State | ||
125 | forests belonged to one or more of the communities listed in the SOFF | 125 | forests belonged to one or more of the communities listed in the SOFF | ||
126 | determination.\r\nTo create the operational map, we assigned every | 126 | determination.\r\nTo create the operational map, we assigned every | ||
127 | mapped API polygon to SOFF based on the plot data, over-storey and | 127 | mapped API polygon to SOFF based on the plot data, over-storey and | ||
128 | understorey attributes, landform features and model output underlying | 128 | understorey attributes, landform features and model output underlying | ||
129 | each API polygon. \r\nIn total, we mapped approximately 272 hectares | 129 | each API polygon. \r\nIn total, we mapped approximately 272 hectares | ||
130 | of SOFF across our full study area.\r\n\r\nOperational map for Swamp | 130 | of SOFF across our full study area.\r\n\r\nOperational map for Swamp | ||
131 | Sclerophyll Forest:\r\n\r\nThe operational map for Swamp Sclerophyll | 131 | Sclerophyll Forest:\r\n\r\nThe operational map for Swamp Sclerophyll | ||
132 | Forest (SSF) was constructed to resolve long-standing issues | 132 | Forest (SSF) was constructed to resolve long-standing issues | ||
133 | surrounding its identification, location and extent within the NSW | 133 | surrounding its identification, location and extent within the NSW | ||
134 | State Forest estate covered by the coastal Integrated Forestry | 134 | State Forest estate covered by the coastal Integrated Forestry | ||
135 | Operation Agreements. The map was constructed in two parts, with State | 135 | Operation Agreements. The map was constructed in two parts, with State | ||
136 | Forests to the north of Sydney being mapped in a separate process to | 136 | Forests to the north of Sydney being mapped in a separate process to | ||
137 | those to the south of Sydney. We did this to minimise the risk that | 137 | those to the south of Sydney. We did this to minimise the risk that | ||
138 | relationships between regional vegetation communities and the TEC | 138 | relationships between regional vegetation communities and the TEC | ||
139 | would be confounded or masked by geographical variation or other major | 139 | would be confounded or masked by geographical variation or other major | ||
140 | ecological gradients, which might otherwise be a significant risk if | 140 | ecological gradients, which might otherwise be a significant risk if | ||
141 | we had treated the full latitudinal range of the TEC as a single study | 141 | we had treated the full latitudinal range of the TEC as a single study | ||
142 | area. In total, we assessed 1,218,000 hectares of State Forest across | 142 | area. In total, we assessed 1,218,000 hectares of State Forest across | ||
143 | coastal NSW. This consisted of 868,000 hectares of State Forest on the | 143 | coastal NSW. This consisted of 868,000 hectares of State Forest on the | ||
144 | north coast and more than 350,000 hectares of State Forest on the | 144 | north coast and more than 350,000 hectares of State Forest on the | ||
145 | south coast.\r\nIn both study areas, the project\u2019s Threatened | 145 | south coast.\r\nIn both study areas, the project\u2019s Threatened | ||
146 | Ecological Community (TEC) Reference Panel (the Panel) preceded the | 146 | Ecological Community (TEC) Reference Panel (the Panel) preceded the | ||
147 | assessment process by reviewing the determination for SSF and agreeing | 147 | assessment process by reviewing the determination for SSF and agreeing | ||
148 | upon a set of diagnostic parameters for its identification. The Panel | 148 | upon a set of diagnostic parameters for its identification. The Panel | ||
149 | found that SSF is primarily defined by floristic plot data and that it | 149 | found that SSF is primarily defined by floristic plot data and that it | ||
150 | is mostly located on coastal floodplains and associated alluvial | 150 | is mostly located on coastal floodplains and associated alluvial | ||
151 | landforms.\r\nFollowing on from these conclusions, we started the | 151 | landforms.\r\nFollowing on from these conclusions, we started the | ||
152 | mapping process by mapping the distribution of floodplains and | 152 | mapping process by mapping the distribution of floodplains and | ||
153 | alluvial soils and thus identifying possible areas of SSF. For both | 153 | alluvial soils and thus identifying possible areas of SSF. For both | ||
154 | the north and the south coast we used an existing map of coastal | 154 | the north and the south coast we used an existing map of coastal | ||
155 | landforms and geology in combination with several fine-scale models of | 155 | landforms and geology in combination with several fine-scale models of | ||
156 | alluvial landform features to determine the likely extent of | 156 | alluvial landform features to determine the likely extent of | ||
157 | floodplains and alluvial soils within our study areas. \r\nWe used | 157 | floodplains and alluvial soils within our study areas. \r\nWe used | ||
158 | aerial photograph interpretation (API) to assess the floristic and | 158 | aerial photograph interpretation (API) to assess the floristic and | ||
159 | structural attributes of the vegetation cover on our modelled alluvial | 159 | structural attributes of the vegetation cover on our modelled alluvial | ||
160 | environments, and thus delineated polygons likely to contain SSF. We | 160 | environments, and thus delineated polygons likely to contain SSF. We | ||
161 | also used API to modify the boundaries of the modelled alluvial areas | 161 | also used API to modify the boundaries of the modelled alluvial areas | ||
162 | using a prescribed list of eucalypt, casuarina and melaleuca species | 162 | using a prescribed list of eucalypt, casuarina and melaleuca species | ||
163 | in combination with the interpretation of landform elements relevant | 163 | in combination with the interpretation of landform elements relevant | ||
164 | to alluvial and floodplain environments.\r\nWe then compiled floristic | 164 | to alluvial and floodplain environments.\r\nWe then compiled floristic | ||
165 | plot data for all State Forest areas within our modelled alluvial | 165 | plot data for all State Forest areas within our modelled alluvial | ||
166 | landforms and API polygons. For both the north and the south coast the | 166 | landforms and API polygons. For both the north and the south coast the | ||
167 | floristic plot data was sourced from both existing flora surveys held | 167 | floristic plot data was sourced from both existing flora surveys held | ||
168 | in the OEH VIS database and from targeted flora surveys conducted | 168 | in the OEH VIS database and from targeted flora surveys conducted | ||
169 | specifically for this project. We compared these plots with those | 169 | specifically for this project. We compared these plots with those | ||
170 | previously assigned to flora communities listed in the determination | 170 | previously assigned to flora communities listed in the determination | ||
171 | of SSF. Both dissimilarity-based methods and multivariate regression | 171 | of SSF. Both dissimilarity-based methods and multivariate regression | ||
172 | methods were used for the comparison. The results of the comparison | 172 | methods were used for the comparison. The results of the comparison | ||
173 | were then used to assess the likelihood that the plots in State | 173 | were then used to assess the likelihood that the plots in State | ||
174 | forests belonged to one or more of the communities listed in the SSF | 174 | forests belonged to one or more of the communities listed in the SSF | ||
175 | determination.\r\nFollowing this, we developed a predictive | 175 | determination.\r\nFollowing this, we developed a predictive | ||
176 | statistical model of the probability of occurrence of SSF using plot | 176 | statistical model of the probability of occurrence of SSF using plot | ||
177 | data and a selection of environmental and remote-sensing variables. | 177 | data and a selection of environmental and remote-sensing variables. | ||
178 | For the north coast, we used a Random Forest model, while for the | 178 | For the north coast, we used a Random Forest model, while for the | ||
179 | south coast we used a Boosted Regression Tree model.\r\nTo create the | 179 | south coast we used a Boosted Regression Tree model.\r\nTo create the | ||
180 | operational map, we assigned every mapped API polygon to SSF if | 180 | operational map, we assigned every mapped API polygon to SSF if | ||
181 | appropriate based on the plot data, over-storey and understorey | 181 | appropriate based on the plot data, over-storey and understorey | ||
182 | attributes, landform features and modelled probabilities underlying | 182 | attributes, landform features and modelled probabilities underlying | ||
183 | each API polygon. In total, we mapped approximately 1131 hectares of | 183 | each API polygon. In total, we mapped approximately 1131 hectares of | ||
184 | SSF across out study area.\r\n\r\nOperational map for Subtropical | 184 | SSF across out study area.\r\n\r\nOperational map for Subtropical | ||
185 | Coastal Floodplain Forest:\r\n\r\nThe operational map for Subtropical | 185 | Coastal Floodplain Forest:\r\n\r\nThe operational map for Subtropical | ||
186 | Coastal Floodplain Forest (SCFF) was constructed to resolve | 186 | Coastal Floodplain Forest (SCFF) was constructed to resolve | ||
187 | long-standing issues surrounding its identification, location and | 187 | long-standing issues surrounding its identification, location and | ||
188 | extent within the NSW State Forest estate covered by the eastern | 188 | extent within the NSW State Forest estate covered by the eastern | ||
189 | Regional Forest Agreements. The project\u2019s Threatened Ecological | 189 | Regional Forest Agreements. The project\u2019s Threatened Ecological | ||
190 | Community (TEC) Reference Panel (the Panel) reviewed the determination | 190 | Community (TEC) Reference Panel (the Panel) reviewed the determination | ||
191 | for SCFF in conjunction with the determinations of three other TECs | 191 | for SCFF in conjunction with the determinations of three other TECs | ||
192 | associated with coastal floodplain environments. The Panel agreed that | 192 | associated with coastal floodplain environments. The Panel agreed that | ||
193 | SCFF is primarily defined by floristic plot data and that it is mostly | 193 | SCFF is primarily defined by floristic plot data and that it is mostly | ||
194 | located on coastal floodplains and associated alluvial | 194 | located on coastal floodplains and associated alluvial | ||
195 | landforms.\r\nThe operational map was constructed in several stages. | 195 | landforms.\r\nThe operational map was constructed in several stages. | ||
196 | Firstly, we identified candidate areas for SCFF by mapping the | 196 | Firstly, we identified candidate areas for SCFF by mapping the | ||
197 | distribution of floodplains and alluvial soils. To do this we used an | 197 | distribution of floodplains and alluvial soils. To do this we used an | ||
198 | existing map of coastal landforms and geology in combination with | 198 | existing map of coastal landforms and geology in combination with | ||
199 | several fine-scale models of alluvial landform features to determine | 199 | several fine-scale models of alluvial landform features to determine | ||
200 | the likely extent of floodplains and alluvial soils in our study area. | 200 | the likely extent of floodplains and alluvial soils in our study area. | ||
201 | \r\nSecondly, we compiled floristic plot data for State Forest areas | 201 | \r\nSecondly, we compiled floristic plot data for State Forest areas | ||
202 | within these alluvial landforms. The floristic plot data was sourced | 202 | within these alluvial landforms. The floristic plot data was sourced | ||
203 | from both existing flora surveys held in the OEH VIS database and from | 203 | from both existing flora surveys held in the OEH VIS database and from | ||
204 | targeted flora surveys conducted specifically for this project. We | 204 | targeted flora surveys conducted specifically for this project. We | ||
205 | compared these plots with those assigned to previously defined | 205 | compared these plots with those assigned to previously defined | ||
206 | communities listed in the determinations for SCFF. Both | 206 | communities listed in the determinations for SCFF. Both | ||
207 | dissimilarity-based methods and multivariate regression methods were | 207 | dissimilarity-based methods and multivariate regression methods were | ||
208 | used for the comparison. The results of the comparison were then used | 208 | used for the comparison. The results of the comparison were then used | ||
209 | to assess the likelihood that plots in State forests belonged to one | 209 | to assess the likelihood that plots in State forests belonged to one | ||
210 | or more of the communities listed in the determination.\r\nThirdly, we | 210 | or more of the communities listed in the determination.\r\nThirdly, we | ||
211 | used aerial photograph interpretation (API) to assess both floristic | 211 | used aerial photograph interpretation (API) to assess both floristic | ||
212 | and structural attributes found on the modelled alluvial and related | 212 | and structural attributes found on the modelled alluvial and related | ||
213 | environments. We also used API to modify the boundaries of the | 213 | environments. We also used API to modify the boundaries of the | ||
214 | modelled alluvial areas using a prescribed list of eucalypt, casuarina | 214 | modelled alluvial areas using a prescribed list of eucalypt, casuarina | ||
215 | and melaleuca species in combination with the interpretation of | 215 | and melaleuca species in combination with the interpretation of | ||
216 | landform elements relevant to alluvial and floodplain | 216 | landform elements relevant to alluvial and floodplain | ||
217 | environments.\r\nFourthly, we used plot data and a selection of | 217 | environments.\r\nFourthly, we used plot data and a selection of | ||
218 | environmental and remote-sensing variables to develop a Random Forest | 218 | environmental and remote-sensing variables to develop a Random Forest | ||
219 | (RF) model of the probability of occurrence of SCFF.\r\nTo create the | 219 | (RF) model of the probability of occurrence of SCFF.\r\nTo create the | ||
220 | operational map, we assigned every mapped API polygon to SCFF if | 220 | operational map, we assigned every mapped API polygon to SCFF if | ||
221 | appropriate based on the plot data, over-storey and understorey | 221 | appropriate based on the plot data, over-storey and understorey | ||
222 | attributes, landform features and modelled probabilities underlying | 222 | attributes, landform features and modelled probabilities underlying | ||
223 | each API polygon. \r\nIn total, we mapped approximately 11,050 | 223 | each API polygon. \r\nIn total, we mapped approximately 11,050 | ||
224 | hectares of Subtropical Coastal Floodplain Forest. The majority of the | 224 | hectares of Subtropical Coastal Floodplain Forest. The majority of the | ||
225 | mapped SCFF was located between Grafton and Casino.\r\n\r\nOperational | 225 | mapped SCFF was located between Grafton and Casino.\r\n\r\nOperational | ||
226 | TEC Mapping have been derived by API at a viewing scale between 1-4000 | 226 | TEC Mapping have been derived by API at a viewing scale between 1-4000 | ||
227 | using ADS40 50 cm pixel imagery and 1 m derived LIDAR DEM grids for | 227 | using ADS40 50 cm pixel imagery and 1 m derived LIDAR DEM grids for | ||
228 | floodplain EECs.", | 228 | floodplain EECs.", | ||
229 | "num_resources": 8, | 229 | "num_resources": 8, | ||
230 | "num_tags": 0, | 230 | "num_tags": 0, | ||
231 | "organization": { | 231 | "organization": { | ||
232 | "approval_status": "approved", | 232 | "approval_status": "approved", | ||
233 | "created": "2018-06-15T18:51:39.525982", | 233 | "created": "2018-06-15T18:51:39.525982", | ||
234 | "description": "EPA is the primary environmental regulator for New | 234 | "description": "EPA is the primary environmental regulator for New | ||
235 | South Wales. Its purpose is to improve environmental performance and | 235 | South Wales. Its purpose is to improve environmental performance and | ||
236 | waste management\r\n\r\nEPA works with the community, business, | 236 | waste management\r\n\r\nEPA works with the community, business, | ||
237 | industry and government to maintain a balance between protecting the | 237 | industry and government to maintain a balance between protecting the | ||
238 | environment, managing competing demands on the environment and | 238 | environment, managing competing demands on the environment and | ||
239 | supporting sustainable growth.\r\n\r\nEPA provides information and | 239 | supporting sustainable growth.\r\n\r\nEPA provides information and | ||
240 | guidance about a broad range of environmental issues and activities. | 240 | guidance about a broad range of environmental issues and activities. | ||
241 | It engages with the community and uses social research to inform | 241 | It engages with the community and uses social research to inform | ||
242 | priorities, policies and programs. It publishes scientific research | 242 | priorities, policies and programs. It publishes scientific research | ||
243 | and monitors trends in the state of the environment, and offers advice | 243 | and monitors trends in the state of the environment, and offers advice | ||
244 | and incentives to help business and industry improve their | 244 | and incentives to help business and industry improve their | ||
245 | environmental performance.\r\n\r\nSee: http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au\r\n", | 245 | environmental performance.\r\n\r\nSee: http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au\r\n", | ||
246 | "id": "83a21590-19cd-49af-a188-f06f5d4fe231", | 246 | "id": "83a21590-19cd-49af-a188-f06f5d4fe231", | ||
247 | "image_url": | 247 | "image_url": | ||
248 | "2020-12-23-034755.133278EPALogoDk-BlueRGB-445x264px-01.png", | 248 | "2020-12-23-034755.133278EPALogoDk-BlueRGB-445x264px-01.png", | ||
249 | "is_organization": true, | 249 | "is_organization": true, | ||
250 | "name": "epa-environment-protection-authority", | 250 | "name": "epa-environment-protection-authority", | ||
251 | "state": "active", | 251 | "state": "active", | ||
252 | "title": "Environment Protection Authority (EPA)", | 252 | "title": "Environment Protection Authority (EPA)", | ||
253 | "type": "organization" | 253 | "type": "organization" | ||
254 | }, | 254 | }, | ||
255 | "owner_org": "83a21590-19cd-49af-a188-f06f5d4fe231", | 255 | "owner_org": "83a21590-19cd-49af-a188-f06f5d4fe231", | ||
256 | "private": false, | 256 | "private": false, | ||
257 | "relationships_as_object": [], | 257 | "relationships_as_object": [], | ||
258 | "relationships_as_subject": [], | 258 | "relationships_as_subject": [], | ||
259 | "resources": [ | 259 | "resources": [ | ||
260 | { | 260 | { | ||
261 | "cache_last_updated": null, | 261 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||
262 | "cache_url": null, | 262 | "cache_url": null, | ||
n | 263 | "created": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.149745", | n | 263 | "created": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.492362", |
264 | "datastore_active": false, | 264 | "datastore_active": false, | ||
265 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | 265 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | ||
266 | "format": "PDF", | 266 | "format": "PDF", | ||
267 | "hash": "", | 267 | "hash": "", | ||
n | 268 | "id": "6fb30153-03fc-40da-8081-77130c291794", | n | 268 | "id": "2fcb8e54-1913-43b3-a729-23c4457d57c5", |
269 | "last_modified": null, | 269 | "last_modified": null, | ||
n | 270 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.004033", | n | 270 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.464543", |
271 | "mimetype": null, | 271 | "mimetype": null, | ||
272 | "mimetype_inner": null, | 272 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||
273 | "name": "Data Quality Statement", | 273 | "name": "Data Quality Statement", | ||
274 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | 274 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | ||
275 | "position": 0, | 275 | "position": 0, | ||
276 | "resource_type": null, | 276 | "resource_type": null, | ||
277 | "size": null, | 277 | "size": null, | ||
278 | "state": "active", | 278 | "state": "active", | ||
279 | "url": | 279 | "url": | ||
280 | -floodplain-tecs-of-the-north-coast/resource/data_quality_report/pdf", | 280 | -floodplain-tecs-of-the-north-coast/resource/data_quality_report/pdf", | ||
281 | "url_type": null | 281 | "url_type": null | ||
282 | }, | 282 | }, | ||
283 | { | 283 | { | ||
284 | "cache_last_updated": null, | 284 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||
285 | "cache_url": null, | 285 | "cache_url": null, | ||
n | 286 | "created": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.149753", | n | 286 | "created": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.492367", |
287 | "datastore_active": false, | 287 | "datastore_active": false, | ||
288 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | 288 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | ||
289 | "format": "PDF", | 289 | "format": "PDF", | ||
290 | "hash": "", | 290 | "hash": "", | ||
n | 291 | "id": "3e7ab481-2b48-4b6d-95ee-4210c4c37ee7", | n | 291 | "id": "d42eddd9-6afc-4554-b7d7-8eb4ddaa7054", |
292 | "last_modified": null, | 292 | "last_modified": null, | ||
n | 293 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.007934", | n | 293 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.464702", |
294 | "mimetype": "application/pdf", | 294 | "mimetype": "application/pdf", | ||
295 | "mimetype_inner": null, | 295 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||
296 | "name": "Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown | 296 | "name": "Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown | ||
297 | Forest Estate", | 297 | Forest Estate", | ||
298 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | 298 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | ||
299 | "position": 1, | 299 | "position": 1, | ||
300 | "resource_type": null, | 300 | "resource_type": null, | ||
301 | "size": null, | 301 | "size": null, | ||
302 | "state": "active", | 302 | "state": "active", | ||
303 | "url": | 303 | "url": | ||
304 | 46fb9ed545/download/assessment-floodplain-tec-north-coast-160627.pdf", | 304 | 46fb9ed545/download/assessment-floodplain-tec-north-coast-160627.pdf", | ||
305 | "url_type": null | 305 | "url_type": null | ||
306 | }, | 306 | }, | ||
307 | { | 307 | { | ||
308 | "cache_last_updated": null, | 308 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||
309 | "cache_url": null, | 309 | "cache_url": null, | ||
n | 310 | "created": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.149755", | n | 310 | "created": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.492369", |
311 | "datastore_active": false, | 311 | "datastore_active": false, | ||
312 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | 312 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | ||
313 | "format": "ZIP", | 313 | "format": "ZIP", | ||
314 | "hash": "", | 314 | "hash": "", | ||
n | 315 | "id": "9f584bf4-64f9-4977-a5c3-bcbfb4291d84", | n | 315 | "id": "7554fc9b-999b-4a01-bdcf-12287ffafb07", |
316 | "last_modified": null, | 316 | "last_modified": null, | ||
n | 317 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.009316", | n | 317 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.464822", |
318 | "mimetype": "application/zip", | 318 | "mimetype": "application/zip", | ||
319 | "mimetype_inner": null, | 319 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||
320 | "name": "Operational Map for Subtropical Coastal Floodplain | 320 | "name": "Operational Map for Subtropical Coastal Floodplain | ||
321 | Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate", | 321 | Forest Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate", | ||
322 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | 322 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | ||
323 | "position": 2, | 323 | "position": 2, | ||
324 | "resource_type": null, | 324 | "resource_type": null, | ||
325 | "size": null, | 325 | "size": null, | ||
326 | "state": "active", | 326 | "state": "active", | ||
327 | "url": | 327 | "url": | ||
328 | foa-data-and-information-management-projectepacorpdb19oct2016tec.zip", | 328 | foa-data-and-information-management-projectepacorpdb19oct2016tec.zip", | ||
329 | "url_type": null | 329 | "url_type": null | ||
330 | }, | 330 | }, | ||
331 | { | 331 | { | ||
332 | "cache_last_updated": null, | 332 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||
333 | "cache_url": null, | 333 | "cache_url": null, | ||
n | 334 | "created": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.149756", | n | 334 | "created": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.492371", |
335 | "datastore_active": false, | 335 | "datastore_active": false, | ||
336 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | 336 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | ||
337 | "format": "ZIP", | 337 | "format": "ZIP", | ||
338 | "hash": "", | 338 | "hash": "", | ||
n | 339 | "id": "c3f96adc-4cc0-40f9-9b34-2b142a56ae98", | n | 339 | "id": "08bd117e-ad92-4529-a063-9886132edfea", |
340 | "last_modified": null, | 340 | "last_modified": null, | ||
n | 341 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.011099", | n | 341 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.464975", |
342 | "mimetype": "application/zip", | 342 | "mimetype": "application/zip", | ||
343 | "mimetype_inner": null, | 343 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||
344 | "name": "Operational Map for River-Flat Eucalypt Forest | 344 | "name": "Operational Map for River-Flat Eucalypt Forest | ||
345 | Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate", | 345 | Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate", | ||
346 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | 346 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | ||
347 | "position": 3, | 347 | "position": 3, | ||
348 | "resource_type": null, | 348 | "resource_type": null, | ||
349 | "size": null, | 349 | "size": null, | ||
350 | "state": "active", | 350 | "state": "active", | ||
351 | "url": | 351 | "url": | ||
352 | foa-data-and-information-management-projectepacorpdb19oct2016don.zip", | 352 | foa-data-and-information-management-projectepacorpdb19oct2016don.zip", | ||
353 | "url_type": null | 353 | "url_type": null | ||
354 | }, | 354 | }, | ||
355 | { | 355 | { | ||
356 | "cache_last_updated": null, | 356 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||
357 | "cache_url": null, | 357 | "cache_url": null, | ||
n | 358 | "created": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.149758", | n | 358 | "created": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.492372", |
359 | "datastore_active": false, | 359 | "datastore_active": false, | ||
360 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | 360 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | ||
361 | "format": "ZIP", | 361 | "format": "ZIP", | ||
362 | "hash": "", | 362 | "hash": "", | ||
n | 363 | "id": "6076f985-7210-4e5a-99b7-f70fd2d50d2e", | n | 363 | "id": "7822fd15-2f89-4812-93b8-405ced4d1d37", |
364 | "last_modified": null, | 364 | "last_modified": null, | ||
n | 365 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.011743", | n | 365 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.465092", |
366 | "mimetype": "application/zip", | 366 | "mimetype": "application/zip", | ||
367 | "mimetype_inner": null, | 367 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||
368 | "name": "Operational Map for Swamp Oak Floodplain Forest | 368 | "name": "Operational Map for Swamp Oak Floodplain Forest | ||
369 | Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate", | 369 | Threatened Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate", | ||
370 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | 370 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | ||
371 | "position": 4, | 371 | "position": 4, | ||
372 | "resource_type": null, | 372 | "resource_type": null, | ||
373 | "size": null, | 373 | "size": null, | ||
374 | "state": "active", | 374 | "state": "active", | ||
375 | "url": | 375 | "url": | ||
376 | foa-data-and-information-management-projectepacorpdb19oct2016don.zip", | 376 | foa-data-and-information-management-projectepacorpdb19oct2016don.zip", | ||
377 | "url_type": null | 377 | "url_type": null | ||
378 | }, | 378 | }, | ||
379 | { | 379 | { | ||
380 | "cache_last_updated": null, | 380 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||
381 | "cache_url": null, | 381 | "cache_url": null, | ||
n | 382 | "created": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.149760", | n | 382 | "created": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.492374", |
383 | "datastore_active": false, | 383 | "datastore_active": false, | ||
384 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | 384 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | ||
385 | "format": "ZIP", | 385 | "format": "ZIP", | ||
386 | "hash": "", | 386 | "hash": "", | ||
n | 387 | "id": "7dc2ce8c-264a-444d-b5a8-96c95a80b932", | n | 387 | "id": "0988e4f9-5a08-4886-b630-d223086110eb", |
388 | "last_modified": null, | 388 | "last_modified": null, | ||
n | 389 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.012360", | n | 389 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.465206", |
390 | "mimetype": "application/zip", | 390 | "mimetype": "application/zip", | ||
391 | "mimetype_inner": null, | 391 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||
392 | "name": "Operational Map for Swamp Sclerophyll Forest Threatened | 392 | "name": "Operational Map for Swamp Sclerophyll Forest Threatened | ||
393 | Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate", | 393 | Ecological Community on NSW Crown Forest Estate", | ||
394 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | 394 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | ||
395 | "position": 5, | 395 | "position": 5, | ||
396 | "resource_type": null, | 396 | "resource_type": null, | ||
397 | "size": null, | 397 | "size": null, | ||
398 | "state": "active", | 398 | "state": "active", | ||
399 | "url": | 399 | "url": | ||
400 | foa-data-and-information-management-projectepacorpdb19oct2016tec.zip", | 400 | foa-data-and-information-management-projectepacorpdb19oct2016tec.zip", | ||
401 | "url_type": null | 401 | "url_type": null | ||
402 | }, | 402 | }, | ||
403 | { | 403 | { | ||
404 | "cache_last_updated": null, | 404 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||
405 | "cache_url": null, | 405 | "cache_url": null, | ||
n | 406 | "created": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.149762", | n | 406 | "created": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.492375", |
407 | "datastore_active": false, | 407 | "datastore_active": false, | ||
408 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | 408 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | ||
409 | "format": "LYR", | 409 | "format": "LYR", | ||
410 | "hash": "", | 410 | "hash": "", | ||
n | 411 | "id": "c3e831ab-f0cc-402a-a33c-e38a3d2ea557", | n | 411 | "id": "1931720f-c386-4959-afa9-05e3c4c9979a", |
412 | "last_modified": null, | 412 | "last_modified": null, | ||
n | 413 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.012790", | n | 413 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.465416", |
414 | "mimetype": null, | 414 | "mimetype": null, | ||
415 | "mimetype_inner": null, | 415 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||
416 | "name": "Operational and Indicative Maps for the Assessment of | 416 | "name": "Operational and Indicative Maps for the Assessment of | ||
417 | Threatened Ecological Communities on NSW Crown Forest Estate", | 417 | Threatened Ecological Communities on NSW Crown Forest Estate", | ||
418 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | 418 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | ||
419 | "position": 6, | 419 | "position": 6, | ||
420 | "resource_type": null, | 420 | "resource_type": null, | ||
421 | "size": null, | 421 | "size": null, | ||
422 | "state": "active", | 422 | "state": "active", | ||
423 | "url": | 423 | "url": | ||
424 | a17cf-8594-4e20-95e9-329da2055c95/download/cusersbealkdesktoptec.lyr", | 424 | a17cf-8594-4e20-95e9-329da2055c95/download/cusersbealkdesktoptec.lyr", | ||
425 | "url_type": null | 425 | "url_type": null | ||
426 | }, | 426 | }, | ||
427 | { | 427 | { | ||
428 | "cache_last_updated": null, | 428 | "cache_last_updated": null, | ||
429 | "cache_url": null, | 429 | "cache_url": null, | ||
n | 430 | "created": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.149763", | n | 430 | "created": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.492377", |
431 | "datastore_active": false, | 431 | "datastore_active": false, | ||
432 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | 432 | "datastore_contains_all_records_of_source_file": false, | ||
433 | "format": "SPATIAL VIEWER", | 433 | "format": "SPATIAL VIEWER", | ||
434 | "hash": "", | 434 | "hash": "", | ||
n | 435 | "id": "73c69aa2-f807-4d70-a03a-accf2ae60296", | n | 435 | "id": "ccdd9c36-2187-467f-93f2-5935f8496b88", |
436 | "last_modified": null, | 436 | "last_modified": null, | ||
t | 437 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T09:52:03.014017", | t | 437 | "metadata_modified": "2024-03-13T14:02:15.465532", |
438 | "mimetype": null, | 438 | "mimetype": null, | ||
439 | "mimetype_inner": null, | 439 | "mimetype_inner": null, | ||
440 | "name": "Native Forestry Map Viewer", | 440 | "name": "Native Forestry Map Viewer", | ||
441 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | 441 | "package_id": "90d9a444-c296-4929-bbb0-b46c338b4f76", | ||
442 | "position": 7, | 442 | "position": 7, | ||
443 | "resource_type": null, | 443 | "resource_type": null, | ||
444 | "size": null, | 444 | "size": null, | ||
445 | "state": "active", | 445 | "state": "active", | ||
446 | "url": | 446 | "url": | ||
447 | ebmap.environment.nsw.gov.au/PlanningHtml5Viewer/?viewer=IFOA_Viewer", | 447 | ebmap.environment.nsw.gov.au/PlanningHtml5Viewer/?viewer=IFOA_Viewer", | ||
448 | "url_type": null | 448 | "url_type": null | ||
449 | } | 449 | } | ||
450 | ], | 450 | ], | ||
451 | "spatial": | 451 | "spatial": | ||
452 | [153.28261,-28.97536],[153.28261,-37.41703],[149.50438,-37.41703]]]}", | 452 | [153.28261,-28.97536],[153.28261,-37.41703],[149.50438,-37.41703]]]}", | ||
453 | "spatial_coverage": | 453 | "spatial_coverage": | ||
454 | [153.28261,-28.97536],[153.28261,-37.41703],[149.50438,-37.41703]]]}", | 454 | [153.28261,-28.97536],[153.28261,-37.41703],[149.50438,-37.41703]]]}", | ||
455 | "state": "active", | 455 | "state": "active", | ||
456 | "tags": [], | 456 | "tags": [], | ||
457 | "temporal_coverage_from": "2016-01-10", | 457 | "temporal_coverage_from": "2016-01-10", | ||
458 | "title": "Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown | 458 | "title": "Assessment of North Coast Floodplain TECs on NSW Crown | ||
459 | Forest Estate", | 459 | Forest Estate", | ||
460 | "type": "dataset", | 460 | "type": "dataset", | ||
461 | "unpublished": "false", | 461 | "unpublished": "false", | ||
462 | "update_freq": "irregular", | 462 | "update_freq": "irregular", | ||
463 | "url": null, | 463 | "url": null, | ||
464 | "version": null | 464 | "version": null | ||
465 | } | 465 | } |